I'm intrigued by this from a historical standpoint. On the other hand, "yet another AR".
Fool-proofing serves only one purpose: identify bigger fools.
I watched their earlier builds and videos on this topic and found some of their ideas intriguing but disagreed with others. Some are solely preference based of course and I’m sure they’d disagree with me as well. The options are so many and varied nowadays it’s an interesting exercise to speculate.
When have any of our plans ever actually worked? We plan, we get there, all hell breaks loose.
Pretty fun to think about. I'm guessing Stoner would have probably designed a different platform, maybe something hybrid. Maybe an AR-180 on a AR-15 lower. I guess Brownells already did that. I get this feeling they're using Stoner as an unpaid silent partner. WWSD is pretty good marketing. But in reality, it's here's our new and improved lower, because our old one sucked.
"Spes Mea in Deo Est"--My hope is in GOD
The antidote for fifty enemies is one friend.--Aristotle
Posting Permissions
1Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote