XCR Forum banner

1 - 3 of 3 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,071 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·




The top shows a typical very late model GUU5P built on an A1 marked lower. M4 barrel, A1 upper, straight slip ring, A2 grip, old style 2-position Al stock. Thrown together parts. These pics had to be from around mid '04 because this unit got their M4's later that year. These GUU's were from dog handlers. I had to surf through my old, old gmail sent items from where I sent these to a gun nut friend awhile back, couldn't find the original folder with the date. Both needed routine maintenance on them and don't ask me what I had to fix or replace because I can't remember back that far! I do recall being surprised when I saw the nomenclature when I was logging them in. (Surprised enough to go home and get my camera at lunch!) I had never seen a true "XM177E2" marked lower before. Since they were a short production item from so long ago (I want to say '66 or '67, if there's an AR afficianado around they might know) my expectation was that they would have been used to destruction by now. But, the beauty of depot storage shows the lower was actually in pretty good shape considering it was just shy of 40 years old.

I never did get a pic of a Colt marked "GAU-5/A/A". I saw a couple but most were modified M16's and the armorers would take a stamp set and a hammer to the lower to mark it, or like this one, never marked with anything but the original factory stamp. Before all of this panic buying nonsense I wanted to get a NoDak A1 lower and get it engraved with it since I had built a GAU upper. Sweet shooting rifle, super light weight too.

Oh yeah, a true 177E1, E2, or GAU barrel will never have a bayonet lug. Carryover from the original E1 design, can't use it anyways.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
986 Posts
Thanx for the pix!!!! If I remember the GAU that I carried as an augmentee it did not have the boynet lug on it.... Like I said when ever I checked out the rifle I would ask for the CAR and the armourer would correct me and GAU... ;D I don't it had the forward assist either now that I think about it.

thank you again...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,071 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
The AF was really a driving force for a lot of the changes on the original AR15/M16's such as chrome bores and chambers. So while big Army is responsible for ground weapons as a whole, the inputs were coming in from everyone. It is interesting that the AF never bought off on the forward assist and chose to upgrade certain areas but never fully adopted the 'A1' as spec'd by the Army. Whether or not it is necessary is a discussion for another time. I placed during an EIC comp with an old M16 and TW74 stamped ammo back in '98. Worked good enough for me.
 
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
Top