[crashy]

Hey guys. I saw this on ar15.com.

http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=6&f=2&t=227390

With this link in there:

http://www.defensetech.org/archives/003625.html

Any chance the XCR could be considered?

Regards,
Crashy

 

[variablebinary]

I'm sure Alex is already trying to get the wheels in motion behind the scenes, but I know someone at AR15.com wrote a certain Senator about getting the masada considered. Doing the same for the XCR might be a good idea.

Though this is just a test, not full on trials. How valuable this test will be to Robinson is up for debate.

 

[Guest]

according to the article it doesnt appear that anyone like the masada, XCR or the like will be included. only H&K and FN.

 

[Grey]

I’ll bet that manufacturing capacity has something to do with who is selected to compete. I am not saying MagPul or RA can’t spool up but HK; FN & Colt are already knocking out product.

At the end of the day I really would like to see our service rifle built in the USA. We should not have to depend on a foreign government for our small arms. Unless HK builds a factory in the USA I would say stay with Colt, FNUSA or a relative new comer like MagPul or RA.

 

[i303]

If they run a real test, the m4/M16 will fail miserably. I speak from experience. Specifically try boarding and exiting a UH60 while rotors are spinning anywhere in the desert!!! Or back of Bradley's and M113 w/rear hatch left open on a dusty road.

 

[i303]

Just so ya'll have a picture in your mind what I am talking about:

Not my pics, but all I have experienced. Not just merely taking it out of the back seat and setting it down on a clean shooting bench under a shade.