XCR Forum banner
1 - 6 of 6 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,623 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
OK this might be a dunbass question but why isn't the !:8 barrel twist industry standard for fighting carbines? It would be better for the heavier bullets and still might work for the 40 grainer's.Hell,even if I were varmint hunting I would still use at least a 55,so what's the deal?



 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,177 Posts
*shrug* Alex and the engineers said they got about the same test results with the 1:8 and the 1:9. I'm a plinker, so the difference doesn't mean much to me. I know it makes a difference when you use higher grain ammunition.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15 Posts
I like the 1:7 best, I can get 1/2" groups with an AR with one and it will shoot everything great from 55 up. 1:8 is almost as good and used by alot of manufacturers today. I don't understand why they picked the 1:9 for the XCR, I think most of the comp. is using 1:7 & 1:8, which makes more sense with todays heavy bullets. I hope they come out with a med./ light 1:7 5.56 barrel down the road.
 
G

·
the varmint loads disintegrate out of a 1-8. I tried the 45grainers and they turned to dust about 8 ft off the muzzle.

that said I prefer the 1-8 too. it's the ideal twist for a fighting carbine.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,071 Posts
1:8 would do everything I need the barrel to do. The 75gr slugs I shoot work fine in the 1:9 but since my 1:7 AR shoots them better I know the XCR can too.

Speaking of barrels, how's about a 20" barrel with an extended receiver?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,537 Posts
Speaking of barrels, how's about a 20" barrel with an extended receiver?
If only.......
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top