Joined
·
448 Posts
I'm no doomsday prophet. I'm not into the 'survivalists' scene, howver I don't see anything wrong with people doing so. But I'm no fool either. For those who choose to ignore the obvious and blast those who just can't help to notice I've found this little piece in the Washinton Post. I'm sure few have read it. More continue to ignore it.
Simply put, humans will continue to repeat history. While we Americans worry about our lap dogs, whether a couple of ****'s can marry, our credit report being more important than life itself, someone else have other plans.
Why does China need a more bigger 'defense' budget? Unless it will be "We had to hit them first b/c they were going to attack" 'defense'.
I generally don't trust media sources, but sometimes they manage to at least hit the paper near the target. And it doesn't tell me anything I already don't know.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20080221/NATION/967794878/1002
And I know America is more concerned with Britney pantiless crotch show for the paparazzi in Hollywood than they are about this.
Simply put, humans will continue to repeat history. While we Americans worry about our lap dogs, whether a couple of ****'s can marry, our credit report being more important than life itself, someone else have other plans.
Why does China need a more bigger 'defense' budget? Unless it will be "We had to hit them first b/c they were going to attack" 'defense'.
I generally don't trust media sources, but sometimes they manage to at least hit the paper near the target. And it doesn't tell me anything I already don't know.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20080221/NATION/967794878/1002
To predict that a WW3 is going to happen is like predicting that the sun will rise from the east tomorrow morning. It's human nature and population control.China arms buildup 'alarming'
By Sara A. Carter
February 21, 2008
China is using billions of American trade dollars to modernize its military force — from purchasing foreign weapons systems and technologies to building its own ships, planes and missiles — a top lawmaker and his colleagues say.
As top U.S. military officials questioned China's intentions in expanding its military last week, ranking House Armed Services Committee member Rep. Duncan Hunter, California Republican, said the reality is that "China is stepping into the superpower shoes left behind by the former Soviet Union."
"China is increasing its production and acquisition of military technology at an alarming rate, and they are doing it with American trade dollars," he added.
Rep. Tim Ryan, Ohio Democrat, who is writing a trade-reform bill with Mr. Hunter, cited the U.S. record deficit with China as further evidence that action is needed on countries that unfairly manipulate their currencies.
China's economic growth has enabled it to sustain a trend of double-digit increases in defense spending. In March 2007, China also announced it would increase its annual defense budget by nearly 18 percent over the previous year to billion.
Military officials said this figure is a low estimate of China's overall defense spending. A recent Department of Defense annual report, "The Military Power of the People's Republic of China," estimated that China's total military-related defense spending is more likely in the range of billion to 5 billion.
China received the second of two Russian-made Sovremenny II guided-missile destroyers fitted with anti-ship cruise missiles in late 2006 — providing China with a capability to challenge American aircraft carriers.
The report states that the Chinese government is also negotiating with the Russians on submarines, such as the Kilo-class diesel submarine; a battalion of S-300PMU-2 surface-to-air missile systems with an intercept range of about 125 miles; AWACS aircraft with air-to-air refueling capability; sophisticated communications equipment among other aircraft and defense systems.
Last week, Adm. Timothy Keating, commander of the U.S. forces in Asia, told Chinese officials during a visit to explain the intentions behind their expanding military power, adding that "transparency" is not enough.
Adm. Gary Roughead, the former Pacific Fleet commander, echoed Adm. Keating's concerns, telling reporters that as China's navy is becoming increasingly stronger, the Asian nation's "intent" becomes more imperative.
The loss of American manufacturing jobs, however, only heightens the issue, said Mr. Ryan, citing the 6 billion annual trade deficit on goods with China.
"Our economy is at risk of recession, we continue to lose manufacturing jobs and we need to have the courage to do something real about it," he said.
And I know America is more concerned with Britney pantiless crotch show for the paparazzi in Hollywood than they are about this.